The case laws on temporary resicence ordinance 2015 Diaries
The case laws on temporary resicence ordinance 2015 Diaries
Blog Article
The punishment prescribed under Section 302 PPC reflects the seriousness with which the Pakistani legal system views intentional murder.
“The evidence regarding wajtakkar and extra-judicial confession being relied upon by the prosecution against the petitioner and his above mentioned co-accused namely Hussain Bakhsh has already been opined via the Lahore High Court, Lahore in its order dated two-12-2010 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No.
This Court could interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in the fashion inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the mode of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding attained with the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. If the conclusion or finding is for example no reasonable person would have ever arrived at, the Court may perhaps interfere with the conclusion or the finding and mold the relief to make it suitable on the facts of every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority could be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-enjoy the evidence or even the nature of punishment. About the aforesaid proposition, we have been fortified because of the decision with the Supreme Court in the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 252 Order Date: 24-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
twelve. There is no denial from the fact that in Government service it is anticipated that the persons owning their character over board, free from any moral stigma, are being inducted. Verification of character and antecedents is usually a condition precedent for appointment to some Government service. The candidates must have good character and supply two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above mentioned is that the only impediment to being appointed to a Government service would be the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a way out or guise to complete absent with the candidature from the petitioner. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Source: Order: Downloads 133 Order Date: 15-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Utilize the PACER Case Locator if You aren't positive which specific federal court the case was filed. You may additionally conduct nationwide searches to determine whether or not a party is involved in the federal case. This database updates at midnight on a daily basis.
The case addresses A variety of issues together with, environmental protection, and an expansive interpretation with the right to life.
be established without an iota of doubt in all other jurisdictions) will be inferred. This is really a horrifying reality, a very lower threshold for an offence that carries capital punishment.
The court cannot listen to the transfer order challenge as it falls within the terms and conditions of service. Regarding the quo warranto writ, the petitioner must file a separate petition to challenge the private respondents' appointment orders keeping in view that one of several respondents has retired from service as pointed out with the counsel to the respondent university. 12. The petition and applications pending therein stand dismissed with no order regarding costs. Read more
after release from the jail he misplaced interest to contest the instant appeal , appeal is dismissed (Criminal Jail Appeal )
This public interest litigation came before the Supreme Court of Pakistan when petitioners challenged the construction of a close-by electricity grid station resulting from probable health risks and hazards.
Using keywords effectively is usually important. Take into consideration using synonyms and variations of your keywords to make sure you seize all relevant results. Understanding the citation system used by Pakistani courts will also help you pinpoint specific cases.
ten. Without touching the merits of the case of the issue of once-a-year increases in the pensionary emoluments in the petitioner, in terms of policy decision in the provincial government, this kind of yearly increase, if permissible from the case of employees of KMC, involves further assessment to be made via the court of plenary jurisdiction. KMC's reluctance as a result of funding issues and deficiency of adoption of provincial increases, creates a factual dispute that cannot be resolved in writ jurisdiction, requiring the petitioner to pursue other legal avenues. Read more
A coalition of residents sent a letter of petition to your Supreme Court to challenge the Water and Power Enhancement Authority’s (WAPDA) construction of the electricity grid station in their community, on designated “green belt” property. The Court heard the matter like a human rights case, as Article 184 (3) of the Pakistan Constitution supplies primary jurisdiction into the Supreme Court to consider up and determine any matter concerning the enforcement of fundamental rights check here of public importance.
These judicial interpretations are distinguished from statutory law, which are codes enacted by legislative bodies, and regulatory regulation, which are set up by executive companies based on statutes.